You are viewing [info]miskal1442's journal

miskal's Journal
 
[Most Recent Entries] [Calendar View] [Friends]

Below are the 20 most recent journal entries recorded in miskal's LiveJournal:

    [ << Previous 20 ]
    Wednesday, October 17th, 2001
    11:03 am
    Any Bets on Answers?
    CNN is asking bin Laden to respond to a set of questions. Read about it here.
    Saturday, October 13th, 2001
    2:36 pm
    Give me a fucking break
    Any idiots (commenters included) that think this is about rebuilding our economy has got to be out of their minds.
    Thursday, October 11th, 2001
    10:32 am
    BSGI has been a Baaaaad Boy
    Are you naive or just plain stupid.

    How nice it would be to live in a world where our intelligence agencies and police agencies can thwart every terrorist attack.

    How nice it would be to have complete personal freedom and be able to live our lives as we want.

    But, you know what, if you think that both of those statements can occur, then you are just plain naive. Yep. Naive. Those goals are mutually incompatible. And, anyone that honestly thinks that we can increase our safety and security without compromising someone's civil rights is not thinking. Anyone who thinks that we should be able to improve our intelligence gathering without getting ourselves "dirty" is a fool. Or, worse, they are liars.

    Anyone who thinks we can easily make a transition from a society dependent upon oil to one which is fully reliant on alternative sources of energy is living in a dream world.

    Any one who thinks our sole interest in the Middle East is money and oil (interconnected) is ill informed, uneducated, biased, or a liar.

    Those who think that we can stop terrorism and bin Laden simply by talking or by feeding the poor is also ill-informed or wants this country destroyed.

    Those who think that this country should not have military personnel in the Middle East because it is wrong are, themselves, wrong.

    Those who think we deserved the terrorist attacks of Sept. 11 or that we deserve them in the future are fools. Same goes for anyone who thinks those who died were in any way responsible or that bin Laden has justification for what happened too.

    Those who think bin Laden is attacking the US solely because of Iraq, the Israeli-Palestinian conflict of US support of Israel, or our presence in the Middle East is either foolish, misinformed, or spewing propaganda.

    Finally, those who blindly think the US is wrong in going after bin Laden with the military (and that does not mean that I approve of bombing), because that was the only choice available, are misguided, at best.

    if you want to comment, you gotta go here.
    Wednesday, October 10th, 2001
    9:26 pm
    Please don't say that people don't
    think we deserve terrorist attacks. This was said in reference to what is happening now:

    "The more this continues as it does, the more I think those 'crazy mullahs' are right: the western powers are rotten. We're genna(sic) get more terrorist shit, and what's worse - we deserve it."

    It is no wonder that pro-war types want to take the anti-war folks out and pummel them. This is a disgusting attitude to have and one that has no moral support what-so-ever.
    Tuesday, October 9th, 2001
    2:49 pm
    ripped off from bedlammessiah
    who said that this cannot be applied to the terrorists.

    the Seven Unspoken Truths
    1. Envy

    Those Americans can't do this to us! We're Arabs. How could they have the ability to do this? What do they have that we don't have?

    2. Gluttony

    You killed thousands of our people, now we are going to decimate your ENTIRE NATION, and, your RELIGION too!

    3. Lust

    Mmm, the sweet smell of dead Americans in their homeland, it almost makes me tingle with delight. (You cold almost read this off of bin Laden's tape.

    4. Anger (Wrath)

    You cannot do this to us and we are PISSED OFF. Get ready to for a suicide bomber.

    5. Covetousness (Greed)

    We only covet thy freedoms. We don't want the rest. So we will destroy you.

    6. Sloth

    Should we try to talk to them? Should we maybe try to reach a mutual understanding, accepting that both sides have made mistakes and now we can move forward peacefully? Nah, let's just blow the fuckers off the planet.

    7. Pride (Vanity)

    Allah bless us. Death to the infidel.


    You can find the original here. And, if you read the comments, you can get a pretty good idea of how the argument changed for one about the statement ot one of personality.
    Monday, October 8th, 2001
    5:51 pm
    Conspiracy theory at its best
    And, the Russians and the CIA worked together to assassinate John Kennedy too! (yeah! right!)

    looky here
    Saturday, October 6th, 2001
    11:48 pm
    From the New York Times
    October 7, 2001


    Military Clerics Balance Arms and Allah


    By LAURIE GOODSTEIN

    [W] ASHINGTON, Oct. 5 ? The pipe organ in the small military chapel here at Walter Reed Army Medical Center is silent. Instead, the sound of worship is a human voice calling, deep and clear, "Allahu Akbar" ? "God is great."

    The voice belongs to Capt. Abdul-Rasheed Muhammad, who eight years ago became the first Muslim chaplain in the United States military. He is now chaplain at the military hospital here, where an ethnically diverse group of Muslim soldiers in fatigues and civilian Army doctors in white jackets knelt on rugs for Friday's communal prayers.

    They find themselves in what they say is an awkward position: Muslim members of the American armed forces preparing to fight a war against terrorists who claim to represent Islam.

    But Chaplain Muhammad sees no conflict between being a loyal soldier and a loyal Muslim and regards his mission as helping American Muslims think through the laws and teachings of their religion. He delivered a sermon intended not only for the faithful in this small chapel but for Muslim leaders in the United States and abroad who he contends have not done enough to condemn the extremists in their midst. While they have denounced the terrorism on American soil, he said, many of them have condoned Palestinian suicide bombers in Israel, for example, or Saudi Arabia's persecution of worshipers of other faiths.
    <http://graphics.nytimes.com/images/misc/spacer.gif>
    <http://graphics.nytimes.com/images/misc/spacer.gif>
    <http://graphics.nytimes.com/images/2001/10/07/national/07musl.1.jpg>
    Paul Hosefros/The New York Times
    Sgt. Jamal Abdelwahed reads from a prayer book before a service at Walter Reed Army Medical Center.

    [Related Articles]
    <http://graphics.nytimes.com/images/misc/spacer.gif> <http://graphics.nytimes.com/images/misc/spacer.gif>
    [A Nation Challenged]


    <http://graphics.nytimes.com/images/misc/spacer.gif> <http://graphics.nytimes.com/images/misc/spacer.gif>
    <http://graphics.nytimes.com/images/misc/spacer.gif>
    <http://graphics.nytimes.com/images/misc/spacer.gif>

    "It is time now for us to not only wake up, but speak up," he said in his small chapel. "The prophet said when we see evil action we are compelled to change it with our hand, challenge it with our tongue or at least hate it in our heart. If we cannot do that, we are not good Muslims."

    The military says it has about 4,000 Muslims in its ranks, most of them blacks but including Arab- and Asian-Americans as well as white converts. But some Muslim veterans say there are at least twice that many because many Muslim recruits do not elect to put their religion on their enlistment papers out of concern that they will be ostracized.

    In fact, they join a military that has become increasingly accommodating to Muslim recruits ? providing prayer rooms on many bases, time off for Friday prayers and combat rations that comply with Islamic dietary restrictions.

    Until 1993, the military had no Muslims among the 3,150 active duty chaplains ? only Christians and Jews. Chaplain Muhammad, who is black and was raised a Baptist, became an Army chaplain in a ceremony that year at the Pentagon. It was three more years before the second Muslim chaplain was commissioned, by the Navy, and by 1999, there were still only four.

    Now there are 14 Muslim chaplains ? 8 in the Army, 3 in the Air Force, and 3 in the Navy, 2 of whom serve in the Marine Corps. The chaplains serve on bases in the United States and in Okinawa, Korea and Germany. At least three have been deployed in recent weeks.

    Colleagues said that two were sent to the Middle East, though military spokesmen said they could not divulge their destinations. They are an ethnically diverse group, chosen to reflect the polyglot picture of Muslims in America, said Qaseem A. Uqdah, a Marine Corps veteran who is executive director of the American Muslim Armed Forces and Veterans Affairs Council, the group designated by the military to select Muslims as chaplain candidates. They include Muslims born into the faith in families originally from Asia, Africa and the Middle East, and Muslim converts who include several blacks, an Anglo- American and a Chinese-American.

    Military officials said they would like to have more Muslim chaplains, but there is a shortage of candidates with the required education. Three Muslim chaplains are being trained at Hartford Seminary in Connecticut, which houses an Islamic study center.

    Those in training at Hartford include a woman who holds the rank of major in the Army. Because traditional Islam forbids women imams, or prayer leaders, she will not be allowed to lead prayers like the male chaplains but will focus on other responsibilities like counseling enlisted members, Mr. Uqdah said.

    Nevertheless, a Muslim chaplain who is a woman could be controversial among Muslims in and out of the ranks, he said, and this particular candidate was chosen, in part, because her high rank might help neutralize any objections. Once commissioned, she would be the highest- ranking Muslim chaplain in the military.

    The newest Muslim chaplain is James J. Yee, a Chinese-American and a West Point graduate who was born into a Lutheran family, took an interest in Islam in college and deepened his convictions while stationed at Fort Knox, Ky., where he was studying vehicle maintenance during the month of Ramadan alongside four visiting Egyptian army officers. In a telephone interview, Chaplain Yee said he left the military to attend a traditional Islamic school in Damascus, Syria, where he spent four years studying Arabic and religion. He is serving with the 29th Signal Battalion at Fort Lewis, Wash.

    Chaplain Yee said that since the attacks on the World Trade Center and the Pentagon, some of the 80 Muslims on his base have come to him with concerns about being deployed to fight Muslims overseas.

    He said he tells them, "An act of terrorism, the taking of innocent civilian lives is prohibited by Islam, and whoever has done this needs to be brought to justice, whether he is Muslim or not."

    After the prayer service at the Army hospital here, Sgt. Jamal Abdelwahed said he was grateful that the American government had not responded to the terrorist attacks with immediate, brute force.

    "It would put me in an awkward situation if the response was blindly punishing a Muslim country," said Sergeant Wahed, a Palestinian- American raised in Kuwait who joined the military for the educational opportunities.

    Lt. Col. Anwar K. Malik, an Army doctor who emigrated from Pakistan 22 years ago, said he had no hesitation about the American military mission. "I have very strong feelings," he said. "We should do everything we can to recompense for the attacks."

    Later, over a lunch of halal pizza, Chaplain Muhammad said he knew that his message critical of some American Muslim leaders would be controversial among those gathered for prayers. Many American Muslim leaders were quick to condemn the terrorist attacks on the United States, he noted, but at the same time have condoned suicide bombers in Israel.

    "I have a great deal of empathy for the Palestinian people and the loss of their homes, but out of desperation, the methods they have chosen have been un-Islamic," Chaplain Muhammad said. "For example, suicide is haram ? forbidden ? and we are not speaking against it."
    Friday, October 5th, 2001
    4:19 pm
    In a democracy
    where does one draw the line between the desires of the majority and the wants of the few.

    For instance, in Berkeley, CA, American flags were removed from fire trucks because some people complained that they viewed the display of the flag as antagonistic. On the surface, it would seem appropriate to be concerned about the feelings and the rights of the few, those who are unable to defend themselves.

    That is on the surface. In this case, was defense of their rights necessary? Why should not the feelings of the many not also be considered when the issue of displaying the flag is considered. It is a symbol of this country, right and wrong, and one in which many of its citizens take pride.

    Is the right of the few so overwhelming here that it outweighs the needs of the many? I think not.

    The only times (generally speaking) the wants of the few should outweigh the wants of the many are when a) their rights are the same; b) the few are having or can have their rights denied them; and, c) protecting those rights does not in turn deny the rights of the many. It should be done, in specific situations in order to restore the rights of the few and/or to ensure that their rights are not denied them.

    Displaying a flag is a right of free speech. Denying that right is denying the right of free speech for the many in favor of the few who object. Objection is not evidence of rights denied. Return the flags to the fire trucks.
    4:08 pm
    Anti-Americanism
    Being against war, any war, or specific wars is not anti-American. One may have perfectly acceptable reasons for that position. However, when those positions happen to include one's own antipathy for America, for what ever reason, then one is anti-American. Many on the left, who are against the war, are anti-American in that they want to see the American government destroyed. Or, perhaps, they just want to see the American way of life, along with capitalism, destroyed. Some may be communists who would want to replace our representative democracy with a communist form of government. Some anti-war, anti-American individuals may be anarchists. They want tosee some or all of the governments of the world destroyed and replaced. But they won't say with what. They may even say they are democratic. But, when you question their reasons or their motives, they will not answer.

    Some who are anti-American may be for the war. They even may be right-wing religious fundamentalists who would tear down the freedoms and the democratic principles of this country in order to replace them with some form of authoritarian government. They are no less dangerous than those on the left who would let others tear down the government for them. The only difference is the anti-war, anti-American types don't want ot get their hands dirty. They want to hang onto their ideals. But, they don't care if you get your hands dirty for them.
    Monday, October 1st, 2001
    7:08 pm
    Evidence
    It appears, from the news, that cables will be sent to US Embassies in various countries. The cables contain an explanation of the evidence linking bin Laden tothe WTC attacks. Once that has been done, I expect that the public will begin to find out what the evidence is shortly there after.

    This also indicates that the US and its allies are getting closer to doing what ever it is that they have planned. I doubt that it will be all out warfare. More than likely to be small groups of troops who will be inserted in a manner to avoid civilian casualties.

    I am cynic enough to think that the Taliban will use civilians as shields and that they will claim civilian casualties when there are none, or in excess of what may occur. The real question is, how can you believe an organization that has already lied to the public?
    6:11 pm
    I don't want war but
    The Taliban are making it difficult to avoid some sort of armed conflict.

    Wire Report

    What happens will be their choice. Avoiding armed conflict of some sort would be very easy if they would but tell the Pakistani that they are willing to turn bin Laden over to the US, the UN, or someone so that he can be tried for his alleged crimes before a court of laws.
    Saturday, March 10th, 2001
    11:22 am
    It ain't your journal
    Don't tell me what to write in it.
    Wednesday, February 28th, 2001
    6:52 pm
    Why?

    Why not?

    I guess it depends upon one's viewpoint!
    Monday, February 26th, 2001
    11:36 pm
    Well
    Does anyone want to come out and play words with me?
    Wednesday, February 21st, 2001
    5:50 pm
    The Meaning of Life
    What is the meaning of life? Does life have a purpose? Do we humans have a purpose in life?

    If our purpose in life is to reproduce, then from nature's standpoint, that is our most important purpose. Not much of a reason for existence is it?

    If, from a religious perspective, our purpose in life is to glorify our creator, then I would suggest that that is not much a reason either.

    If or purpose is to see to the management of the earth and its resources, then we are not much more than slaves.

    No matter what our purpose may be, we are bound to it. It is not a purpose of our choosing and as such it is one in which we are enslaved. However, that is not to say that we can not define other purposes in live for which to live. Purposes which can give our lives meaning beyond that which is instilled in us.

    What do you think?
    Saturday, February 10th, 2001
    11:21 pm
    A lesson for all
    When you fight a battle with a half-wit, you are fighting at a disadvantage and doomed to lose.
    Friday, February 2nd, 2001
    6:09 pm
    Censorship
    Should there be any censorship at all, a little limited censorship, or all out censorship? Are warning labels and ratings an appropriate substitute? What do YOU think?

    Tell us. Rant. Defend. Speak Out.
    Friday, January 26th, 2001
    10:42 am
    Ask Me!
    Ok, here is your chance. Ask me a question. ANy question. Go ahead. Challenge me, try to embarrass me. Have at me. I dare you. :)
    Friday, January 19th, 2001
    11:19 pm
    Memories
    What is your favorite memory? What would you like for a favorite memory in the future?
    Monday, January 15th, 2001
    2:24 pm
    If
    you could go back and redo any one thing in your life, what would it be. How would you redo it? Why?
[ << Previous 20 ]
About LiveJournal.com